U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against TPS as an Admission for Adjustment of Status

June 9, 2021 Anne Walsh


The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individuals who entered the U.S. without permission cannot obtain status as permanent residents from within the U.S. simply because they are in the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program.

In a unanimous decision on June 7, 2021, the Supreme Court held that a grant of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is not an admission into the U.S. to apply for adjustment of status and lawful permanent residency. The court justices reached their decision based on the text in Section 1255 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which states that eligibility for lawful permanent residence requires lawful entry into the country at the discretion of an immigration officer. The court held that federal law only allows individuals to apply for a green card and LPR status if they are legally admitted into the U.S.


The TPS program allows individuals to live and work temporarily in the U.S. on account of unsafe conditions in their home countries, such as armed conflicts and natural disasters. The TPS program grants individuals work authorization on a temporary, nonimmigrant basis.

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled against Salvadoran nationals Jose Sanchez and Sonia Gonzalez in Sanchez v. Mayorkas. Sanchez entered the U.S. without permission, later received a grant and extensions of TPS, and applied for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residency following sponsorship by an employer. Previously, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit also ruled against Sanchez and Gonzalez, concluding that the petitioners were ineligible for LPR status because they had not been inspected and admitted to the U.S. Their grant and extensions of TPS did not cure that deficiency.  

Looking Ahead

The recent ruling may impact individuals in the TPS program. The ruling also follows a recent extension of TPS protection to Burmese nationals and Haitian nationals.


Envoy is pleased to provide you this information, which was prepared in collaboration with Anne Walsh, who is a Partner at Global Immigration Associates, P.C. (www.giafirm.com), Envoy’s affiliated law firm.

Content in this publication is not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. For additional information on the issues discussed, consult an Envoy-affiliated attorney or another qualified professional.

About the Author

Anne is a Partner with Global Immigration Associates. In this role, she provides counsel for companies ranging from startups to Fortune 500 corporations and their foreign national employees. Anne’s practice focuses on obtaining visas and employment-based green cards in all categories; immigration compliance arising from corporate changes, such as reorganizations and restructuring; and office relocations and company immigration policies and best practices. She also has extensive experience preparing and reviewing business immigration filings, requests for further evidence and appeals, and in researching and analyzing immigration statutes, policy and procedure. Anne works with clients in several industries, including software, cloud technology, manufacturing and electronics. In addition to her employment-based practice, Anne provides counsel for individuals pursuing visas and green cards through family relationships.

More Content by Anne Walsh
Previous Article
Canada: Stanley Cup Travel Exemptions Approved for NHL Players
Canada: Stanley Cup Travel Exemptions Approved for NHL Players

The Canadian government is relaxing travel restrictions for National Hockey League (NHL) teams crossing the...

Next Article
Canada: Immigration Minister Mendicino Announces Two Hong Kong-Focused PR Programs
Canada: Immigration Minister Mendicino Announces Two Hong Kong-Focused PR Programs

Canada's Immigration Minister has announced two permanent residence (PR) pathways for workers or recent gra...